Mauno Saari


Blogin arkisto

Uusimmat kommentit

Media, sodan lietsojaKeijo Kansalainen  15.2.2022 15:55
Media, sodan lietsojaPekka Peitsi  15.2.2022 12:39
Media, sodan lietsojaJorma Uimonen  15.2.2022 10:33
Media, sodan lietsojaPirjo Tamminiemi  14.2.2022 18:08
Media, sodan lietsojaKaija L A Kukkonen  14.2.2022 8:30

Uusimmat kirjoitukset


Käyntejä kotisivuilla:478265 kpl

Dan Steinbockin tilannekatsaus

Keskiviikko 23.3.2022 klo 13:33 - Mauno Saari

Julkaisen tässä tri Dan Steinbockin perusteellisen analyysin USA/EU:n pakotepolitiikan seurauksista ja Ukrainan sodasta. Dan on ystäväni, jonka kauan sitten – 1970-luvulla – pestasin Suomen Kuvalehden avustajaksi.

Oli mainiota seurata, miten Danin vaikeaselkoisiksi koettuihin ja syvällisiksi osoittautuneisiin esseisiin suhtauduttiin. Jyrkin puolustaja oli Otavassa, Paavo Haavikko, jonka mielestä Dan oli sen hetken suurimpia lupauksia monella tavalla, ennen kaikkea ennakkoluulottomana ajattelijana.

Dan Steinbock on toimii useassa maassa ja useilla mantereilla arvostettuna tutkijana, kuten tämän jutun lopusta selviää. Uskon, että lukeminen kannattaa!

New Global Tsunamis Courtesy of Cold Warriors and Fed Hawks By Dan Steinbock

After trade wars and the pandemic depression, aggressive sanctions and rate hikes will further derail economic prospects in the US, China and worldwide.

A central blueprint of the Ukrainian crisis comes in part from a 2019 report by RAND Corp., US defense contractors' think tank, which outlined the steps for maximum sanctions. As the crisis erupted, the Biden administration reversed its promise to fine-target Russian sanctions, in order not to harm Russian people and the world economy.

Ukraine is the means. The goal is to default the Russian economy. The severe scarring of the world economy is seen as collateral damage.

Energy and food shocks, prelude to more global pain

Commodities reached a high of 4,160 in early March and have soared 33 percent since the beginning of the year. Food prices have climbed to an all-time high, nearly 21 percent above their level a year ago. The UN is warning of a meltdown of the worlds food system.

At the same time, energy prices have shot up in global markets. Crude oil climbed to a high of $125 in early March and has increased to $105 per barrel or almost 50 percent since the beginning of the year. In Europe, the most exposed region to Russian energy, natural gas quintupled to a high of over $250 and is hovering around $112 (101.47). But these are just preludes to tragedies to come (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Commodity, Oil and Natural Gas Shocks

Commodities Oil Natural Gas (EU)

Sources: Commodities: The Commodity Index (S&P GSCI); food prices: UN/FAO food price index; oil: Crude oil (WTI); natural gas (EU Dutch TTF), March 21, 2022

page1image26085248 page1image26085440 page1image26083712 page1image24018944

Russia is the world's 11th largest, $1.8 trillion economy. Given its key role in global energy supply, Goldman Sachs (GS) has warned that the global economy "could soon be faced with one of the largest energy supply shocks ever."

Lets set these figures in the context of the largest post-war energy disruptions. Amid the still intensifying military conflict, escalating Western sanctions and growing isolation of Russia,” GS expects a base case of 1.6 million barrel/day disruption. Pessimists predict worse-case scenarios pushing crude prices up to $200; a third higher than in summer 2008 prior to the Great Recession.

In closer scrutiny, the most benign scenario (GS-1) is an underestimate. The medium scenario (GS-2) would have required proactive diplomacy and rapid crisis neutralization. In the absence of such initiatives soon, the world economy may inch toward the severe scenario (GS-3), reminiscent of the OPEC oil embargo (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Largest Post-war Oil Supply Disruptions

* Peak supply loss in millions of barrels per day. GS scenarios in red

Source: Data from Goldman Sachs; Difference Group

Slowing growth, stagflation and rate hikes

In 2021, U.S. real GDP increased 5.5 percent, fastest since 1984 as the economy continued to recover from the adverse pandemic effects. Wages grew at fastest pace in decades, but prices increased even more, so the net effect was negative.

In 2021, most GDP expansion was accounted for by increased inventory investment and service spending. In the past two years the pandemic has lowered the economic output potential. During the ongoing year, GDP growth will slow because the level of fiscal support is smaller and the economy is closer to maximum employment.

Worse, inflation has proved stickier than anticipated because the Federal Reserve began to cut rates belatedly in March 2020 ignoring the WHO's early warnings. The second mistake ensued after mid-year 2021, when inflation began to climb rapidly. As the Fed left the ultra-low rates intact, the galloping inflation soared to 7 percent in December, the fastest since 1982. America was coping with low interest rates and high inflation: stagflation (Figure 3).


Figure 3 US Inflation and Fed Funds Rate, 2015-22


Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Federal Reserve; Difference Group, March 21, 2022

In addition to rate hikes, the Fed will start reducing its balance sheet, perhaps already in May, and those reductions could happen twice as fast as the last time. The double-whammy will have painful consequences, as Thomas Koenig, a former member of the Feds Committee (FOMC) has warned for years.

Ambitious targets viable with stability

Early in the year, Chinas economy, despite the overseas Omicron threat, was still fueled by strong data on trade and investment and further opening of capital markets. Foreign holdings of government bonds were at record levels fostering the yuan's appreciation. Export-led industrial expansion and retail sales rebounded.

On the supply side, governments fiscal spending and infrastructure investment contributed to improving fixed asset investment. As policies have been refined in the property markets, the goal has been to facilitate the completion of presold homes and support new purchases.

However, major projects could raise the stimulus effect up to 7.7 percent of the GDP as headwinds have accelerated rapidly since late February. Despite strong vigilance, the COVID-19 infections, due to spillovers from Hong Kong, have led to the lockdown of major cities, including Shanghai and Shenzhen in the Guangdong province, where factories account for almost a fourth of exports.

The Government Work Report indicates solid support for the economy and fiscal spending. The central bank (PBOC) will further ease the monetary policy. Premier Li Keqiang announced the new GDP growth target for the year of around 5.5 percent."

Amid unprecedented headwinds, the targets have been called ambitious but they may be viable, if the Ukraine crisis and pandemic outbreaks will not prove protracted.

Hedging against energy and food risks

China is promoting front-loaded policy support to strengthen the economy amid the global headwinds. Some of the key investment areas will concentrate on food and

page3image26185280 page3image26184896 page3image26188160

energy security. It is important to fill the rice bowl of Chinese people, mainly with Chinese grain,” as President Xi Jinping recently said.

Last year, more than half of China's energy imports (almost $425 billion) comprised crude oil. But oil and natural gas imports are diversified, so losses could be offset in part by cheaper imports from Russia, China's second-largest oil supplier. Recently, Beijing and Moscow also signed a new 30-year $112 billion natural gas contract. It could go through the rapidly-expanding yuan-denominated trade system.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia, China's largest source of oil, is considering accepting payments in the Chinese currency, instead of US dollar, for some oil purchases.

As the yuan has strengthened from about 7.18 in June 2020 to about 6.35 to US dollar, the appreciation will allow China to secure the imports of other commodities at lower costs.

Rapidly-rising interest payments, an economic time bomb

After trade wars, the pandemic depression, aggressive sanctions and rate hikes, the Biden administration has accelerated debt-taking to pay for its infrastructure initiative, while spending ever more in the forever wars.” Unsurprisingly, concern in the markets about a US recession is growing as soaring commodity prices, reduced fiscal spending and rising interest rates threaten economic expansion.

Not so long ago, the White House argued that aggressive debt-taking was tolerable because the burden of servicing it has fallen. That was the advice of Democratic heavy-weight economists to Biden in December 2020. But the guidance was short- sighted and naïve. Net interest payments are becoming the fastest growing element of the federal budget.

In a decade, interest costs are set to exceed 12 percent of the entire federal budget, while almost tripling to $910 billion (Figure 4a). By 2050 the sum total of net interest costs is likely to exceed $60 trillion as interest payments will take up almost half of all federal revenues. That's an economic time bomb (Figure 4b).

Figure 4 Rising Interest Costs

a. Net interest costs will rise sharply... b. ... and take up a rising share of revenues

Net Interest as % of GDP, 2020-30 Net Interest as % of Federal Revenues, 1970- 2050

Source: Congressional Budget Office; Office of Management and Budget; Difference Group

page4image26040704 page4image26035904 page4image26039552 page4image26042048page4image24092384

Sanctions compound global risks

In the West, economic sanctions are portrayed as a solution to the Ukraine crisis with minimal harm to the world economy. In reality, they will make a regional war, which was unwarranted and avoidable, far worse, while undermining global prospects in the short-term and contributing to untenable risks over time.

The original version was published by China-US Focus on March 22, 2022

Dr. Dan Steinbock is an internationally recognized strategist of the multipolar world

and the founder of Difference Group. He has served at India, China and America

Institute (US), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU

Center (Singapore). For more, see https://www.differencegroup.net/

Lue lisää »

Kommentoi kirjoitusta. Avainsanat: Ukraina, Nato, USA, talouskriisi, pakotteet